Common Criteria Evaluation And Validation Scheme

The evaluation was carried out in accordance to the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) process and scheme. 0, 10 September 2015 and Errata for the Hard Copy Device Protection Profile v1. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) is a United States Government program administered by the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) to evaluate security functionality of an information technology with conformance to the Common Criteria international standard. Just a note 99,999 is a valid number in France, its the same as 99. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation. CSE is responsible for the program management of the Common Criteria in Canada and acts as the certification body. NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS) Xu, Yangyang; Wang, Ying. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) … Security defines information technology attributes and assurance mechanisms for … As part of the Information Security Reading Room. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. The criteria against which the Juniper Networks Security Appliances TOE was judged are described in the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3. Products used within the Department of Defense may be submitted for evaluation at evaluation assurance levels (EALs) 1-7 through the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). CCEVS stands for Common Criteria Evaluation & Validation Scheme (National Information Assurance Partnership). implementation of the Common Criteria, including management of the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) validation body. contained in its security target. Although few in number, the differentiating features of these two processes are significant, and understanding these formal approaches. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). In August 2007, Government Computing News (GCN) columnist William Jackson critically examined Common Criteria methodology and its US implementation by the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). Welcome to Gossamer Security Solutions! As of 1 September 2012 we are open for business. Evaluation and Validation scheme: Common Metric The common metric of a contemporary evaluation comprises: -Criteria yCommon Criteria (CC) - current version 2. Vendors having completed Common Criteria evaluation are eligible to sell their evaluated products to federal agencies operating national security systems. Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls have achieved Common Criteria (CC) certification under the rigorous National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). The program, officially known as the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme for IT Security is a partnership between the public and private sectors. Organizations turning to NetIQ for control over their Identity Management lifecycle can now verify the evaluation level certification of Identity Manager 4. Involved in audits conducted in the lab. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Security Agency (NSA) have established a national program, the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) for the evaluation of information technology internationally. Evaluation Scheme United States NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Protection Profile Protection Profile for Hardcopy Devices, Version 1. 1 Conformity assessment scheme (CAS): For the purpose of this document a conformity assessment scheme, as defined in ISO/IEC 17000, is a documented and publicly available set of requirements which establishes the following:. The report will clearly indicate whether the acceptance criteria have been met based on the results generated. CiteSeerX - Document Details (Isaac Councill, Lee Giles, Pradeep Teregowda): requirements outlined in Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Publication #6 "Assurance Continuity: Guidance for Maintenance and Re-evaluation", 8 September 2008. 内容提示: National Information Assurance PartnershipCommon Criteria Evaluation and Validation SchemeValidation ReportMicrosoft CorporationWindows 2000Report Number: CCEVS-VR-02-0025Dated: 25 October 2002Version: 2. Common Criteria Validation and Evaluation Scheme. To find out more about an author: Google the author's name or dig deeper in the library's biographical source databases. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) is a United States Government program administered by the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) to evaluate security functionality of an information technology with conformance to the Common Criteria international standard. The RSA® Adaptive Authentication solution and the RSA® Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Suite from RSA, The Security Division of EMC (NYSE: EMC), have been certified to meet the security requirements defined by the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). atsec information security today announced that Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 has been certified by the U. In addition to the Common Criteria Certification, Oracle Linux cryptographic modules are also now FIPS 140-2 validated. NIAP/CCEVS. Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, (Common Criteria 1 1998; Common Criteria 2 1998; Common Criteria 3 1998)). Windows 7 Passes the Common Criteria Certification Process NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS),” Lipner added. To learn more about Common Criteria in general, reference the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) website at the following link:. for conformance to the Common Criteria. There is a current lack of consensus regarding methods of assessment of vitiligo. To ensure vendors meet this mandate, NIAP operates the Common Criteria Evaluation & Validation Scheme (CCEVS) to facilitate the evaluation of IT products against the Common Criteria standard. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). The evaluation was conducted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme, and the conclusions of CSC in their Evaluation Technical Report (ETR) were consistent with the evidence adduced. Scheme Update from Poland Setting up Common Criteria ITSEF – Chances and Challenges Mr Dariusz Rogowski Research Assistant, ŁUKASIEWICZ Research Network – Institute of Innovative Technologies EMAG. Evaluation Scheme United States NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Target of Evaluation A) Xerox WorkCentre 7655 [OR] B) Xerox WorkCentre 7665 Protection Profile None Security Target Xerox WorkCentre 7655/7665 Multifunction Systems Security Target Version 1. Department of Defense (DOD) National Security Agency (NSA) National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). Reform of the CAP and global rises in food prices resulted in an increase in budget from €300 to €500 million Euros in 2010 with the added power to buy food on the open market. The international scope of Common Criteria, currently adopted by fourteen nations, allows users from other countries to purchase Information Technology products with the same level of confidence, since certification is recognized across all complying nations. Through our multi-site security testing laboratories, Cygnacom is accredited to. implementation of the Common Criteria, including management of the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) validation body. Powered by WebAIM Need more than just one page at a time? Pope Tech is an enterprise-level web accessibility evaluation system based on WAVE that provides site-wide monitoring and reporting of accessibility over time. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report: IBM Corporation, IBM Cryptographic Security Chip for PC Clients Manufactured by ATMEL (AT90SP0801) 5. The evaluation was consistent with National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) policies and practices as described on their web site (www. The program, officially known as the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) is a partnership between the public and private sectors to help organizations select commercial off-the-shelf information technology (IT) products that meet their security requirements and to help manufacturers of those products gain acceptance in. 1, revision 4 and the assurance activities specified in Protection Profile for Server Virtualization, version 1. To quote from the NIAP1 validator's report for the WorkCentre product2,"The TOE3 is a single system (i. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Security Agency (NSA) have established a national program, the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) for the evaluation of information technology internationally. Department of Defense (DOD) National Security Agency (NSA) National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). Scheme using the Common Methodology for IT Security Evaluation, Version 3. Rationale: This is staffed by NIST And NSA employees. 1, prepared by CCEVS. CiteSeerX - Document Details (Isaac Councill, Lee Giles, Pradeep Teregowda): requirements outlined in Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Publication #6 "Assurance Continuity: Guidance for Maintenance and Re-evaluation", 8 September 2008. 1 Revision 4. The evaluation demonstrated that the product meets the security requirements contained in the Security Target. Training Evaluation - Forms and Questionnaires. Common Criteria is an international standard for computer security certification that verifies that a product meets independent security assurance requirements. Common Criteria allows for mutual recognition by twenty six countries of the certifications provided by authorized independent laboratories through the Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement (CCRA). During the award ceremony two customers received certificates as successful results of atsec’s evaluation work: Oracle and Qualcomm. Common Criteria definition: Formal computer security evaluation criteria that originated in the 1960s when the U. Scheme this past year Current status of the U. AUTHOR(S) NIAP 7. Evaluated Configurations. There are many important benefits to CC: 1. Abbreviation(s) and Synonym(s): CCEVS. national program for the evaluation of information technology products for conformance to the International Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation. Administered by the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP), the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) represents an agreed upon standard for independent certification. Just a note 99,999 is a valid number in France, its the same as 99. To receive certification, software is evaluated for security in a defined and controlled environment with clearly delineated configuration and environment. 0 — Publication #3Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme , Guidance to Validators, - Version 2. CSE is responsible for the program management of the Common Criteria in Canada and acts as the certification body. Common Criteria (CC) is an international set of guidelines and specifications developed for evaluating information security products, specifically to ensure they meet an agreed-upon security standard for government deployments. The Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Security Framework [10] is shown in figure 1. Learn why the Common Core is important for your child. Common Criteria is a globally accepted standard for evaluating the security. The resulting EP is intended to serve as a consistent "building block" for evaluation of TLS functionality in application software, operating systems, mobile devices, and other IT. Figure 2: Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) Security Framework xi is to be used. 1 National Information Assurance Partnership 2 Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report, Image Overwrite Security for Xerox WorkCentre M35/M45/M55 and WorkCentre Pro 35/45/55. • Common Criteria • The Evaluated Configuration • Authorized Administrator • TOE Requirements 1. The RSA® Adaptive Authentication solution and the RSA® Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Suite from RSA, The Security Division of EMC (NYSE: EMC), have been certified to meet the security requirements defined by the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). atsec information security today announced that Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 has been certified by the U. Disclaimer This report is not an endorsement of the TOE by any agency of the U. TD0233 applied to this evaluation. 1 SP6 TOE was judged are described in the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 2. Under the auspices of the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP), NIST and the National Security Agency announced the approval of the first four accredited IT security testing laboratories under the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). The Adaptive Server evaluation for security was carried out in accordance with the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) process and scheme. Common Criteria definition: Formal computer security evaluation criteria that originated in the 1960s when the U. Target of Evaluation (TOE)  – the product or system that is the subject of the evaluation. The Leidos evaluation team determined that the Seagate Secure TCG SSC Self-Encrypting drives. Windows 7 Passes the Common Criteria Certification Process NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS),” Lipner added. National Information Assurance Partnership's (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme , German Federal Office for Information Security (Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik, BSI). known as the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). 4 September 2008. At the same time atsec was mentioned as one of the five labs that have been licensed by the Cyber Security Agency (CSA) to be a Common Criteria Testing lab (CCTL) under the Singapore Common Criteria Scheme (SCCS). Hardcopy devices and Common Criteria certificati Historical certification trends Since the first Common Criteria. The Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (referred to as Common Criteria or CC) is an international standard (ISO/IEC 15408) for computer security certification. Company's IT security risk management solution becomes first to be certified by NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation Program to be certified by the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme. Common Criteria is an internationally. National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) as conformant to EAL4+ and the Controlled Access Protection Profile (CAPP), Labeled Security Protection Profile (LSPP) and Role Based Access Control (RBAC). The Common Criteria program, officially known as the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme for IT Security (CCEVS) is a partnership between the public and private sectors. (see today's announcement for more details). Most folks call it Common Criteria. NIST HANDBOOK 150-20 2005 Edition National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY TESTING: COMMON CRITERIA Jeffrey Horlick National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program. Common Criteria Protection Profiles. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) … Security defines information technology attributes and assurance mechanisms for … As part of the Information Security Reading Room. Red Hat, Inc. nCipher, leader in critical information systems and cybersecurity, announces that its nShield hardware security modules (HSMs) have received Common Criteria Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL) 4+ certification, ensuring customers have the utmost confidence in nCipher’s range of advanced cryptographic solutions. Evaluation Scheme United States NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Protection Profile Protection Profile for Hardcopy Devices, Version 1. Cray has announced that their Cray Linux Environment [CLE] has just been certified under the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme. NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS) Xu, Yangyang; Wang, Ying. It is currently available for Windows and Linux operating systems. Well, that is our closer look at one of the 16 recommended techniques used by business analysts, acceptance and evaluation criteria. Under the auspices of the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP), NIST and the National Security Agency announced the approval of the first four accredited IT security testing laboratories under the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme. 1 extended by Scheme Interpretations for conformance to the Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation (CC), Version 3. that conform to the Common Criteria. This evaluation is being conducted in the USA with the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) with… November 5, 2009 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★. Common Criteria is a framework in which computer system users can specify their security functional and assurance requirements through the use of Protection Profiles, vendors can then implement and/or make claims about the security. To quote from the NIAP1 validator's report for the WorkCentre product2,"The TOE3 is a single system (i. common criteria, evaluation. It is necessary to determine common criteria for the interpretation of test results of official control laboratories in order to ensure a harmonised implementation of. signatories, NSA and NIST, working jointly for the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP), have developed the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS), which summarizes all the standards used by the U. The resulting Extended Package (EP) will permit evaluation of such functionality through the Common Criteria paradigm. To reach consensus. 0, 1 July 2005 Evaluation Technical Report. The Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation is an international standard that helps to define the security aspects and secure implementations of software and hardware. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme and the conclusions of the testing laboratory in the evaluation technical report are consistent with the evidence adduced. should be superseded by a criteria approach, in which performance criteria and procedures for the validation of screening and confirmatory methods are defined. Red Hat, Inc. These labs conduct IT security evaluations for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, International Standard ISO/IEC 15408. Forcepoint is excited to announce we have expanded our Common Criteria Certified portfolio and have completed Common Criteria Testing with Leidos, Inc. The evaluation has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme and the conclusions of the testing laboratory in the evaluation technical report is consistent with the evidence provided. The evaluation and validation were consistent with National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) policies and practices as described on their web site www. Common Criteria is a globally accepted standard for evaluating the security. About the Common Criteria Evaluation. Summary of changes in the CC/CEM from v2. We are in the process of applying to become a Common Criteria Testing Laboratory operating within the U. - November 16, 2009 - Azul Systems, the award-winning leader of enterprise server appliances for business-critical Java™ applications, today announced that it is officially "in evaluation" with the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) for Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme for IT. 1 Motivation for Security Assurance and Validation Mechanism In the ICOM, smart cards are under control of their respective card issuers, and they define the security requirements [4]. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme for Information Technology Security: Guidance to Validators of IT Security Evaluations [NATIONAL INST OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY GAITHERSBURG MD] on Amazon. government began a research program investigating the security of its initial multiple-user operating systems. The following BlackBerry products have obtained a Common Criteria EAL 2+ certification:. In the United States, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory Accredi-tation Program (NVLAP) accredits CCTLs to meet National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) requirements and. 0 — Publication #3Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme , Guidance to Validators, - Version 2. These labs conduct IT security evaluations for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, International Standard ISO/IEC 15408. Common Criteria (CC) NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme for IT SeNIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme for IT Security (CCEVS. The following BlackBerry products have obtained a Common Criteria EAL 2+ certification:. There are three sections to the Common Criteria (CC) version 2. The Common Criteria scheme is supported by the National Security Agency through the National Information Assurance Program (NIAP). uk XtreemOS Training Day 2 Formal Security Evaluations. In a bid to reduce emissions from shipping, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has set a target of January 2020 for the implementation of a new policy that limits the sulfur content of maritime fuel to 0. 4, Level 50 Protection Profile None Security Target Innovation FDRERASE Version 5. Evaluation Scheme United States NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Target of Evaluation Innovation FDRERASE Version 5. provisions of the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme and the Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement (CCRA). implementations of Transport Layer Security. Administered by the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP), the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) represents an agreed upon standard for independent certification. Common Criteria is an internationally recognized set of guidelines (ISO 15408), which define a common framework for evaluating security features and capabilities of Information Technology security products against functional and assurance requirements. The IT security evaluation criteria are to be those laid down in the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (CC), the version endorsed by the Management Committee and the evaluation methods are to be those laid down in the Common Methodology. 4 The international scope of Common Criteria, currently adopted by fourteen nations, allows users from other countries to purchase Information Technology products with the same level of confidence, since certification is recognized across all complying nations. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) is a United States Government program administered by the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) to evaluate information technology (IT) product conformance to the Common Criteria international standard. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Security Agency (NSA) have established a national program, the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) for the evaluation of information technology internationally. It is currently in version 3. provisions of the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme and the Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement (CCRA). that conform to the Common Criteria. — Publication #2Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme , - Quality Manual and Standard Operating Procedures, Version 2. The Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (referred to as Common Criteria or CC) is an international standard (ISO/IEC 15408) for computer security certification. EVALUATION OF GRID SECURITY SOLUTIONS USING COMMON. The Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) is a joint National Security Agency (NSA) and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) effort to establish commercial facilities to perform trusted product evaluations. Evaluation Scheme United States NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Protection Profile Protection Profile for Hardcopy Devices, Version 1. Company's IT security risk management solution becomes first to be certified by NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation Program to be certified by the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme. An Overview of the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Sceheme. The Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (CC) is an international standard (ISO/IEC 15408) for computer security certification. Evaluated Configurations. National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) as conformant to EAL4+ and the Controlled Access Protection Profile (CAPP), Labeled Security Protection Profile (LSPP) and Role Based Access Control (RBAC). We are in the process of applying to become a Common Criteria Testing Laboratory operating within the U. 0 — Publication #6, Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme - Assurance Continuity: Guidance for Maintenance and Re-evaluation, Version 2. The evaluation was consistent with National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) policies and practices as described on their web site (www. Training Evaluation - Forms and Questionnaires. 0 — Publication #4, Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Guidance to CCEVS Approved -. 2 (Flaw reporting procedures). Common Criteria Validation and Evaluation Scheme. Policies and criteria for the validation of programmes of education and training FOREWORD QQI is a statutory body with express functions including the validation of programmes of education and training and has established these Policies and Criteria pursuant to section 44 (1) of the Qualifications and Quality Assurance (Education and Training) Act. 1 Common Criteria 7The Common Criteria is an organi zation that performs evaluation of commercial products to test the security requirements of these products. Common Criteria (CC) is an international set of guidelines and specifications developed for evaluating information security products, specifically to ensure they meet an agreed-upon security standard for government deployments. With our 50 licensed evaluators, we have successfully completed over 600 evaluation projects according to CC (from EAL1 to EAL7). Transition Guide. ix The terminology used in the common criteria process is unique to the process and the semantics are fundamental to understanding the CC activities. Summary of changes in the CC/CEM from v2. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). BigFix announced that the BigFix platform is in final evaluation with the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS), which is a United States government program administered by the. 5 product against the Malaysian Common Criteria Evaluation & Certification (MyCC) Scheme. The evaluation was consistent with National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) policies and practices as described on their web site (www. Welcome to Gossamer Security Solutions! As of 1 September 2012 we are open for business. Common Criteria is a globally accepted standard for evaluating the security. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme. Tiger Clients can download Common Criteria 10. Recently, the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) and the Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF) were proposed to offer more accurate measures of disease severity indexes and treatment evaluation criteria. Common Criteria Evaluation according to ISO 15408 Originates from software (ITSEC, Orange book) CC library enables formal description of security functionality and on how to get assurance on security Evaluation of manufacturer formal claim for security (“Security Target”) by independent lab Application notes give specifics for application. Evaluation and Validation scheme: Common Metric The common metric of a contemporary evaluation comprises: -Criteria yCommon Criteria (CC) - current version 2. Common Criteria Background to the Common Criteria The Common Criteria (CC), which became ISO standard 15408 in 1999, is an alignment and development of a number of source IT security evaluation criteria including existing European (ITSEC), US (TCSEC - Orange Book) and Canadian (CTCPEC). The evaluation and validation were consistent with National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) policies and practices as described on their web site www. This Validation Report applies only to the specific version of the TOE as evaluated. Chapter 18: Evaluating Systems •Goals •Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria •FIPS 140 •Common Criteria it’s CC Evaluation and Validation Scheme;. 1 Conformity assessment scheme (CAS): For the purpose of this document a conformity assessment scheme, as defined in ISO/IEC 17000, is a documented and publicly available set of requirements which establishes the following:. 1, Revision 3, July 2009. Introduction. This post will be about the other major security certification: Common Criteria. The evaluation has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme and the conclusions of the testing laboratory in the evaluation technical report is consistent with the evidence provided. Summary of changes in the CC/CEM from v2. Acceptance criteria help development teams define the boundaries of a user story. 2 Security Assurance and Validation Mechanism In this section, a brief description of the rationale and requirements for the proposed model is provided. Security Evaluation (CEM), version 2. Another evaluation criterion that is common across all SBIR/STTR programs is Experience, Qualifications and Facilities. 1 revision 5. The Security. Transition Guide. The criteria against which the WebLogic Integration V8. European Union lawmakers from the two parties forming Italy's new government coalition voted this week to set up EU funds to help countries quit the euro, a sign of the Italian leadership's ambivalent position on the common currency. Re: Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Post by gatorback » Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:53 pm If there is an update to the CentOS Common Criteria Evaluation saga, please post your story. Department of Defense (DoD) National Security Agency (NSA) National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). Common Criteria is an internationally. 1 Motivation for Security Assurance and Validation Mechanism In the ICOM, smart cards are under control of their respective card issuers, and they define the security requirements [4]. The evaluation was carried out in accordance to the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) process and scheme. Naqvi_at_rl. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) process and scheme. Comments about specific definitions. The evaluation and validation were consistent with National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) policies and practices as described on their web site www. The National Information Assurance Partnership/Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (NIAP/CCEVS) is pleased to invite interested parties to be part of the Technical Community (TC) for the update of the Wireless Intrusion Detection System (WIDS) Extended Package. uk XtreemOS Training Day 2 Formal Security Evaluations. The Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) is administered in the United States by The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Security Agency (NSA) under the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP). Mac OS X v10. Scheme in the upcoming year The U. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Booz Allen & Hamilton 8283 Greensboro Drive. The evaluation was consistent with National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) policies and practices as described on their web site (www. Evaluation utilizes many of the same methodologies used in traditional social research, but because evaluation takes place within a political and organizational context, it requires group skills, management ability, political dexterity, sensitivity to multiple stakeholders. 2 of the Controlled Access Protection Profile (CAPP), Version 1. There are many important benefits to CC: 1. Most folks call it Common Criteria. 1 (stated within PP). This Validation Report applies only to the specific version of the TOE as evaluated. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) … Security defines information technology attributes and assurance mechanisms for … As part of the Information Security Reading Room. the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme using the Common Methodology for IT Security Evaluation, Version 3. Glossary Comments. They can be found at the site of NIAP [5] TCG demands an Evaluation Assurance Level EAL3 and a Strength of Function target of BASIC for the evaluation of the TPM1. Paradinas - 2011 Introduction & definitions The Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (CC), and the companion Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation (CEM) are the technical basis for an international. To make a diagnosis of ADHD, the. The evaluation has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme and the conclusions of the testing laboratory in the evaluation technical report is consistent with the evidence provided. This program is intended to help consumers select commercial off-the-shelf information technology (IT) products that meet necessary security requirements and. The SAIC evaluation team determined that the product is Common Criteria Part 2 Extended and. EVALUATION OF GRID SECURITY SOLUTIONS USING COMMON. — Centrify Corporation, the leading provider of security and compliance solutions that centrally control, secure and audit access to cross-platform systems, mobile devices and applications using Active Directory, today announced that its Centrify DirectControl v5. (see today's announcement for more details). Following initial validation, product testing will advance to in vivo efficacy testing in greenhouse and field trials. Common Criteria Evaluation & Validation Scheme - How is Common Criteria Evaluation & Validation Scheme. The evaluation of Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 was conducted by SAIC as the CC Test Laboratory (CCTL) and the U. The program, officially known as the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) is a partnership between the public and private sectors to help organizations select commercial off-the-shelf information technology (IT) products that meet their security requirements and to help manufacturers of those products gain acceptance in. National Information Assurance Partnership's (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme , German Federal Office for Information Security (Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik, BSI). In addition to the Common Criteria Certification, Oracle Linux cryptographic modules are also now FIPS 140-2 validated. Evaluation Scheme United States NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Protection Profile Protection Profile for Hardcopy Devices, Version 1. It is currently available for Windows and Linux operating systems. 1, revision 4 and the assurance activities specified in the Protection Profile for Mobility Device Fundamentals, version 2. Additionally, the document provides information to the CCTLs and sponsors of evaluations about the activities and responsibilities of assigned Validators. Necessity and Meaning of Information Technology Security Evaluation Based on International Standards. NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts: Analytical and/or Clinical Validation of a Candidate Biomarker for Pain (R61/R33 Clinical Trial Optional) RFA-NS-18-046. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme and the conclusions of the testing laboratory in the evaluation technical report are consistent with the evidence adduced. Common Criteria is an internationally. Aruba Mobility Controllers and access points have now completed two different Common Criteria evaluations, and are in the process of a third. The evaluation was consistent with National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) policies and practices as described on their web site (www. The second set of evaluation criteria is comprised of the maximum neck shear force and maximum neck tension measured on the dummy during the test. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme • Staffed by NIST and NSA personnel • Establishes a national program for evaluation for conformance to the Common Criteria • Approves testing laboratories (CCTLs) • Validates results of evaluations performed by CCTLs • Issues Common Criteria certificate. About the Common Criteria Evaluation. •SAIC Common Criteria Testing Laboratory Common Criteria Testing Laboratory Within the context of the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS), an IT security evaluation facility, accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and aproved by the NIAP Validation Body to conduct Common Critieria. NIAP/CCEVS. MOWBRAY, MARKC. Igor Furgel: Common Criteria: How does this Standard work? Security & Trust for the deployment of information & telecommunication systems 29th of March, 2005, page 10. And in terms of Common Criteria, the scheme is responsible for making sure that all commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) products evaluated in that particular country have been evaluated consistently and independently according to Common Criteria requirements. (NYSE: RHT), the world's leading provider of open source solutions, today announced that Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Windows 7 Passes the Common Criteria Certification Process NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS),” Lipner added. The Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) is a joint National Security Agency (NSA) and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) effort to establish commercial facilities to perform trusted product evaluations. for conformance to the Common Criteria. Abbreviation(s) and Synonym(s): CCEVS. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) is a United States Government program administered by the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) to evaluate information technology (IT) product conformance to the Common Criteria international standard. Common Criteria Testing Lab Accredited by the Turkish Standards Institution (TSE) to conduct common criteria evaluations. Independent (third party) attestation of a developers security claims against a defined security evaluation criteria. , title = {Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme} common criterion evaluation. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme. This Validation Report applies only to the specific version of the TOE as evaluated. In addition to the Common Criteria Certification, Oracle Linux cryptographic modules are also now FIPS 140-2 validated. Most folks call it Common Criteria. Westboro, MA, June 22, 2009 - Corero, a leading global provider of Network Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS), today announced that its IPS 5500 E-Series has received Common Criteria validation at Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL) 4, the highest level of evaluation assurance available on the IPS market. It is currently available for Windows and Linux operating systems. 1 Motivation for Security Assurance and Validation Mechanism In the ICOM, smart cards are under control of their respective card issuers, and they define the security requirements [4]. Austin, TX (PRWEB) February 2, 2005 atsec information security is currently pioneering the evaluation of a software component in collaboration with the U. 1, Revision 3, July 2009. These three sections are Introduction and General Model (section one), Security Functional Requirements (section two), and Security Assurance. that conform to the Common Criteria. The validation team monitored the activities of the evaluation team, examined evaluation testing procedures, witnessed testing, provided guidance on technical issues and evaluation. About Common Criteria Tools for 10. Pivotal to the scientific and engineering process is the testing of hypothesis and the validation of mathematical and computational models. Course summary evaluations, focus group questions, and expert observation tools are included. To achieve a particular EAL, the computer system must meet specific assurance requirements. The Leidos evaluation team determined that the Seagate Secure TCG SSC Self-Encrypting drives. Common Criteria definition: Formal computer security evaluation criteria that originated in the 1960s when the U. The evaluation was consistent with National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) policies and practices as described on their web site (www. Evaluations are performed by a commercial Common Criteria Evaluation Facility (CCEF) under the oversight of the Certification Body, which is managed by. 999 in uk/ us format, so if you are reading in a string from say an input form then 99,999 may be true. SSLs should not be used as site-specific cleanup levels unless a site-specific nine-criteria evaluation using SSLs as PRGs for soils indicates that a selected remedy achieving the SSLs is protective, compliant with applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs), and appropriately balances the other criteria, including cost. The second set of evaluation criteria is comprised of the maximum neck shear force and maximum neck tension measured on the dummy during the test. Great! At the same time, sadly, a core international standard for assurance: the Common Criteria (CC) (ISO 15408), is at risk. The evaluation was consistent with National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) policies and practices as described on their web site (www. , Common Criteria, CC) that is. 1 Revision 4. 1 revision 5. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme. Common Criteria is more formally called "Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation. Products used within the Department of Defense may be submitted for evaluation at evaluation assurance levels (EALs) 1-7 through the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS). Summary of changes in the CC/CEM from v2. Involves developing a traceability matrix Ensures that requirements have been taken into consideration (if not there should be a reason) Ensures that everything in the specification is justified Verify that the requirements are well written (according to the criteria already discussed) * Prototyping (1) Excellent for validation by users and. In the United States, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory Accredi-tation Program (NVLAP) accredits CCTLs to meet National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) requirements and. 1 Motivation for Security Assurance and Validation Mechanism In the ICOM, smart cards are under control of their respective card issuers, and they define the security requirements [4]. 0 National Institute of Standards and Technology National Security Agency Information Technology Laboratory Information Assurance Directorate 100 Bureau Drive 9800. The National Information Assurance Partnership/Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (NIAP/CCEVS) is pleased to invite interested parties to be part of the Technical Community (TC) for the update of the Wireless Intrusion Detection System (WIDS) Extended Package. CSC concluded that the Common Criteria requirements of EAL4 had been met for the TOE. Conformance evaluation resulting in a certificate issued by one of the following: U. The evaluation has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme and the conclusions of the testing laboratory in the evaluation technical report are consistent with the evidence adduced. The evaluation was for Evaluation Assurance Level 2 (EAL2) augmented with ALC_FLR. 1 Revision 4, for conformance to the Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation, Version 3. in accordance with the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) process. What is the abbreviation for Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme? What does CCEVS stand for? CCEVS abbreviation stands for Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme. , title = {Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme} common criterion evaluation. The evaluation was consistent with NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) policies and practices as described on their web site (www. 0, 10 September 2015 and Errata for the Hard Copy Device Protection Profile v1. Key achievements • Promoted to senior position within 6 months of appointment • Developed and implemented a lean strategy for supply chain and blood stocks management, with savings of over £40K per annum. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) is a United States Government program administered by the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) to evaluate security functionality of an information technology with conformance to the Common Criteria international standard. Common Criteria is a globally accepted standard for evaluating the security. , Common Criteria, CC) that is. The validation team provided guidance on technical issues and evaluation processes,. The second set of evaluation criteria is comprised of the maximum neck shear force and maximum neck tension measured on the dummy during the test.